His interpretation of the phrase “nobles are bound” is entirely selfish. His explanation of the phrase implies that anyone other than his loved ones and relatives, and anyone he loves, is unworthy of attention and deserves death. In this case, the difference between the hero and the curse user is not significant; the only difference is that the hero cares for those who care for him, while the curse user cares for his power. Both are ultimately selfish, thinking only of themselves and what pleases them. But this is nothing new; it’s what is expected of nobles: selfish, greedy, arrogant, conceited, and haughty. There is a slight difference between them, not a significant one at all, in fact, it is very small. Furthermore, the meaning of the phrase “nobles are bound” seems to depend on the individual. The noble person chooses the meaning of this phrase, and certainly, everyone will interpret it in a way that serves their own interests and ego.
nwfy
His interpretation of the phrase “nobles are bound” is entirely selfish. His explanation of the phrase implies that anyone other than his loved ones and relatives, and anyone he loves, is unworthy of attention and deserves death. In this case, the difference between the hero and the curse user is not significant; the only difference is that the hero cares for those who care for him, while the curse user cares for his power. Both are ultimately selfish, thinking only of themselves and what pleases them. But this is nothing new; it’s what is expected of nobles: selfish, greedy, arrogant, conceited, and haughty. There is a slight difference between them, not a significant one at all, in fact, it is very small. Furthermore, the meaning of the phrase “nobles are bound” seems to depend on the individual. The noble person chooses the meaning of this phrase, and certainly, everyone will interpret it in a way that serves their own interests and ego.
kznecro
this is a dumpster dive duder no need to put so much effort into hating it.